Skip to content

Law Firm’s Attempt to Reverse $185K Decision Ends in Defeat

In a recent turn of events, a law firm’s attempt to challenge a compensation ruling amounting to over $185,000 has been denied. The firm faced this setback after dismissing a junior lawyer, Joseph Carbone, who lodged nearly 250 complaints against it.

James McConvill & Associates had initially been directed to pay Carbone this hefty sum by Federal Circuit Court Judge Alister McNab in 2021. This ruling was prompted by Carbone’s dismissal in 2018, following his allegations about the firm’s principal, James McConvill. Carbone accused McConvill of recurrently dismissing and re-engaging an employee with whom he allegedly shared a romantic relationship.

Judge McNab, in his 2021 verdict, acknowledged some peculiar aspects of the case. Among these was Carbone’s impressive first-year earnings as a legal practitioner, exceeding $400,000.

James McConvill & Associates, alongside McConvill himself, later appealed against most of Judge McNab’s directives. They faced another disappointment when Federal Court Justice John Snaden denied their provisional application to halt payment in the previous year. Justice Snaden upheld that Carbone deserved the rewards of his triumph.

This year, Justice Snaden upheld Judge McNab’s verdict. He evaluated four grounds of appeal, including assumptions about Carbone’s continued employment duration and owed annual leave amount, cost allocation for Carbone’s forsaken claims, and directions for penalty payments.

While deliberating the first point, Justice Snaden dismissed the appellant’s reasoning about Carbone’s potential employment span, stating, “the evidence favoured a different result” did not necessarily mean the lower court judge had erred.

Furthermore, despite the law firm’s bookkeeper’s contention that Carbone’s owed annual leave was only $78.12, Justice Snaden agreed with Judge McNab’s conclusion that Carbone was due $5061.54. Justice Snaden attributed any possible miscalculations to the way parties, including the appellants, handled the investigation.

Regarding the employer’s costs for Carbone’s dropped claims and penalty payments, Justice Snaden affirmed Judge McNab’s decision. He noted that Carbone should benefit from the penalties as he had incurred significant costs to secure his victories. Justice Snaden emphasized, “that proposition cannot be doubted,” refuting the appellant’s suggestions to the contrary.

Overall, the ruling stands as a testament to legal accountability and underscores the repercussions of dismissals based on complaints made by employees. This case has undoubtedly set a significant precedent for future workplace disputes.

Call Frontline Employment Defenders Now so we can help if you have been bullied or unfairly dismissed on1300 089 353 or visit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *